Answers to Some Objections
against the "Siri
1. The "Siri Thesis" and its supporters have
failed to explain everything that happened with irrefutable documentation and
courtroom acceptable proof. Therefore, why should I believe it?
A. One of the first tactics of disinformation
operatives is to try and discredit the
legitimate investigations by repeatedly pointing out that the investigators have
not completely explained everything that happened. This objection, regarding the
current crisis in the Church, is also sincerely raised by many who are first
discovering this information, but who don't want to accept it unless absolutely
necessary -- because it would mean a complete change in their world view, as
well as massive inconvenience in daily practice.
If there had been no essential changes introduced by
the "Vatican II Popes" which violated the infallibility and indefectibility of
the Church as defined by the First Vatican Council in regards to the Mass,
Sacraments, Canon Law, Ecumenical Council documents, etc. -- then no one would
be talking about the white smoke of October 26, 1958.
Naturally in the 1960s and even the 1970s, there
were almost no Catholics in the world who were seeking to jump to the conclusion
that Paul VI was an anti-pope, even though, to quote the late Fr. Francis Fenton
at the time, he did "pose quite a problem." But as numerous disturbing changes
turned into a demolition operation against orthodoxy -- with anti-Catholics like
"Archbishop Joseph Bernardin" in power every where, and the loyal, orthodox
priests persecuted, slandered, and driven from the premises of the occupied
Catholic Church properties -- alert Catholics began to look into what was
Once a Catholic realizes that changes such as
falsifying Christ's words in the consecration of the Mass (i.e., the New Mass in
English and other vernacular versions), signing heresies and false moral
teaching in Ecumenical Council Documents (i.e., Moslems pray to the same God
that Catholic do; anyone has the RIGHT to spread false doctrines and teaching in
public), and instituting bad disciplines (i.e., such as Communion in the Hand
with no paten) -- that such changes could not be imposed on the faithful by a
true Pope, then the question immediately becomes: where is the Pope? What has
happened to the Papacy?
Catholics would ask this question because they know
that Christ will fulfill His promise to be with His Church always.
Next, logically, Catholics would look back to the
"scene of the crime" -- when all the attacks on the Faith, orthodoxy, and sanity
began, namely, October, 1958. And, sure enough, we find the inexplicable event
of the white smoke of October 26, 1958, after which no Pope emerged on the
balcony, despite compelling and numerous signs that one should have. (See "white
smoke" article in Section I on this website's Home Page.)
Once all the compelling actual and circumstantial evidence is piled up regarding
how the "Siri Thesis" would answer everything regarding the current crisis in
the Church, many sincere Catholics begin to "see the light" at least for a few
seconds. I have noticed over the years at that point that a number of these
sincere individuals exhibit a mild
panic and begin to throw up objections to salvage the legitimacy of the "Vatican
II Popes", and thereby hold on to their long held views upon which they
have based their daily attempts to practice of the Faith. I would ask such
Catholics to consider the proposed answers to the following questions:
(To be continued)
* Why didn't Siri act like a Pope after the October 1958 conclave?
* If God let an antipope usurp the Chair of Peter, then wouldn't the Gates of
Hell have prevailed?
* And more, coming soon . . .